Surgical Approaches

Leave a Comment / General Surgery / By

Surgical Approaches in Abdominal Surgery














Surgical Approaches in Abdominal Surgery

 

Midline Incision

  • Description: A vertical cut along the abdomen’s center, starting above the pubic bone and potentially extending towards the chest.
  • Usage: Commonly used for diagnostic laparotomies, offering wide access to abdominal organs.
  • Recovery: May result in a longer recuperation period.

Transverse Incision

  • Application: Often employed in gynecological surgeries like cesarean deliveries.
  • Benefits: Generally allows for quicker recovery compared to a midline incision.
  • Flexibility: Provides less operational maneuverability.

Oblique Incisions

  • Purpose: Tailored for specific organ exposures, positioned 2-5 cm off the midline.
  • Access: Facilitates access to the stomach, liver, and spleen.

Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Technique: Involves small incisions, typically in the navel, for inserting a camera and instruments.
  • Advantages: Improved recovery times, shorter hospital stays, and a quicker return to normal activities.

Other Incisions

  • Varieties: Include the Lanz incision, paramedian incisions, and the Kochler incision, each for specific surgeries.
  • Specific Applications: Tailored for different types of abdominal operations.

Types of Procedures

  • Conventional Surgeries: Such as segmental colectomies, abdominoperineal resection, small bowel resection, repair of parastomal hernias, ostomy creation and revisions, low anterior resection.
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures: Appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hernia repairs, etc.

Recovery and Post-Operative Care

  • Hospital Stay: Usually requires four to five nights in the hospital.
  • Home Recovery: Approximately six weeks of recovery at home before resuming work or regular activities.
  • Healing Process: Varies based on the surgery’s depth and the patient’s overall health.
  • Preparation and Aftercare: Essential for successful recovery.

Potential Complications

  • Risks: Include hematoma, stitch abscess, wound infection, wound dehiscence, fistula formation, wound pain, hernia, and scarring.
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery: Reduced risk of these complications due to advancements in surgical techniques.

Structured Overview of Surgical Incisions

Surgical incisions are categorized based on their location and specific surgical purposes. 

Basics

  1. Midline Incision
    • A vertical cut along the midline of the abdomen.
    • Provides wide access to abdominal organs.
    • Minimizes muscle cutting, reducing pain and aiding recovery.
  2. Paramedian Incision
    • Positioned slightly off the midline.
    • Used when midline approach is not ideal, offering access to specific regions.

Upper Abdomen

  1. Kocher Incision
    • A subcostal incision, usually on the right.
    • Accesses the gallbladder, duodenum, and biliary tract.
    • Offers excellent exposure for upper abdominal procedures.
  2. Chevron Incision
    • A bilateral subcostal incision in an inverted ‘V’ shape.
    • Ideal for liver, pancreas, and biliary system surgeries.
  3. Inverted L Incision
    • Combines midline and transverse incisions.
    • Used in hepatectomies and right hemicolectomies.

Appendectomy

  1. McBurney Incision
    • An oblique incision over McBurney’s point.
    • Specifically for appendectomies.
  2. Lanz Incision
    • A transverse variation of McBurney’s incision.
    • Offers cosmetic advantages with minimal scarring.

Lower Abdomen

  1. Rutherford-Morrison Incision
    • An oblique extension of the gridiron incision.
    • Primarily for renal transplants and kidney surgeries.
  2. Pfannenstiel Incision
    • Location: Made slightly above the pubic bone.
    • Usage: Commonly used in gynecological surgeries, cesarean sections, and lower abdominal procedures.
    • Advantages: Offers cosmetic benefits due to its location and reduced post-operative pain due to minimal muscle cutting.

Midline Incisions in Abdominal Surgery

 

Introduction

A midline incision is a frequently used surgical approach in abdominal procedures. Characterized by its vertical orientation, this incision aligns with the linea alba, the central line of the abdomen. It spans from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis, curving around the umbilicus.

Access and Exposure

The midline incision is renowned for offering superior exposure to the abdominal and retroperitoneal areas. Its key advantages include:

  • Broad Access: Enables rapid and extensive access to the entire abdominal cavity.
  • Low Risk of Injury: Minimizes the risk of significant vascular or nerve damage.

Technique

The incision involves cutting through various tissue layers:

  • Skin and Subcutaneous Layers: Involves the skin, Camper’s fascia (subcutaneous fatty layer), and Scarpa’s fascia (membranous layer).
  • Deeper Layers: Includes the linea alba, transversalis fascia, preperitoneal fat, and the parietal peritoneum.

Advantages

The midline incision is preferred for several reasons:

  • Efficient Entry: Allows quick access into the abdominal cavity with minimal blood loss.
  • Easy Modification: Can be readily extended as needed based on operative findings.
  • Simplified Closure: Does not necessitate muscle splitting, enabling faster, one-layer closure.

Considerations and Disadvantages

Despite its advantages, the midline incision has some potential drawbacks:

  • Recovery and Scarring: May lead to longer recovery times and significant scarring.
  • Risk of Complications: Associated with possible complications, including infection, hernia, and adhesions.

Paramedian Incisions in Abdominal Surgery

 

Overview

Paramedian incisions are a specific surgical approach utilized in open abdominal procedures. Their main characteristic is their placement, typically 2-5 cm from the trunk’s midline on the abdomen. This strategic positioning allows surgeons to access vital abdominal structures, including the stomach, liver, and spleen.

Incision Technique

The process of making a paramedian incision involves several steps:

  • Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue: The initial cut is made through the skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue.
  • Anterior Rectus Sheath: The incision then extends through the anterior rectus sheath.
  • Rectus Muscle and Posterior Sheath: If feasible, the rectus muscle is moved laterally to expose the posterior rectus sheath, particularly above the arcuate line.

The precision in the placement of this incision is critical for ensuring both optimal visibility during the operation and maintaining adequate blood supply.

Advantages and Considerations

Paramedian incisions are chosen for several reasons:

  • Reduced Incisional Hernias: Compared to midline incisions, paramedian incisions have been reported to result in significantly fewer incisional hernias.
  • Major Elective Laparotomies: They are often recommended for major elective laparotomies due to these benefits.

However, there are also considerations to bear in mind:

  • Post-Operative Pain: These incisions might lead to slightly increased post-operative pain, attributed to the layered closure technique involving suturing and approximation.
  • Surgical Decision: The choice of incision is contingent upon various factors, including the specific surgical procedure, the patient’s overall condition, and the surgeon’s expertise and preference.
  • Potential Complications: As with any surgical procedure, potential complications such as infection, hernia formation, and adhesions should be considered.

Kocher Incision

Overview

The Kocher incision is a specialized surgical incision primarily employed in operations involving the gallbladder, biliary tree, and liver. Positioned just below the rib cage on the right side of the abdomen, this subcostal incision runs parallel to and below the subcostal margin, the lower border of the rib cage.


Characteristics and Anatomy

  • Location: Right side of the abdomen, beneath the rib cage.
  • Direction: Parallel to and inferior to the subcostal margin.
  • Layers Involved: The incision penetrates the anterior rectus fascia, rectus muscle, internal oblique, transverse abdominis, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.
  • Blood Supply Considerations: Unlike the midline incision, the Kocher incision disrupts the abdominal wall’s blood supply, particularly affecting the distal portion of the superior epigastric vessels.

Advantages

  • Enhanced Visualization: Offers superior access and visibility to organs like the gallbladder and biliary tree.
  • Reduced Hospital Stay: Associated with potentially shorter hospitalization compared to midline incisions.
  • Lower Incisional Hernia Risk: Reports suggest a decreased incidence of incisional hernias versus midline incisions.

Disadvantages

  • Increased Postoperative Pain: May result in more pain after surgery compared to other incision types.
  • Longer Surgical Time: The closure of multiple layers can extend the duration of the operation.

Usage

The Kocher incision is commonly utilized for cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal) and can be adapted for more complex liver or pancreas procedures. It can be modified into a Chevron or rooftop incision (extending across the abdomen) or a Mercedes Benz incision (including a vertical chest extension).

Considerations

  • Surgical Decision Factors: The choice of incision is influenced by several factors, including the need for surgical field access, especially in oncological resections, and postoperative recovery considerations like pain, potential complications, and the risk of incisional hernias.
  • Individualized Approach: The Kocher incision is one of many surgical options, chosen based on the specific requirements of the surgery, the patient’s anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise and judgment.

McBurney Incision

Introduction

The McBurney incision, also known as the Gridiron incision, is a specialized surgical incision primarily used for appendectomies, the removal of the appendix.

Historical Background

  • Origin: Named after Charles McBurney, a 19th-century New York surgeon.
  • McBurney’s Point: Identified as the “seat of greatest pain” in appendicitis, located in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, a third of the way from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus.


Technique and Anatomy

  • Location and Direction: The incision is obliquely made at McBurney’s point, generally perpendicular to the line from the umbilicus to the right anterior superior iliac spine.
  • Tissue Layers Involved: Involves cutting through the skin, external oblique, internal oblique, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.

Advantages

  • Cosmetic Outcomes: Follows the Langer’s lines of skin tension, resulting in potentially favorable cosmetic results.
  • Surgical Exposure: Offers effective exposure for conducting open appendectomies.

Potential Risks

  • Incisional Hernias: Although the risk is low, the development of incisional hernias is a potential complication.
  • Other Complications: Includes risks like infection and adhesions.

Lanz Incision: A Surgical Approach for Appendectomies

 

Overview of the Lanz Incision

  • Also Known As: Referred to as the Rockey-Davis incision.
  • Primary Use: Predominantly utilized for open appendectomies.

Location and Technique

  • Positioning: The incision is made at McBurney’s point, situated in the right iliac fossa.
  • Landmarks: It is aligned at the junction of the middle and outer thirds of a line from the right anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the umbilicus.

Cosmetic Considerations

  • Aesthetic Design: The Lanz incision is more cosmetically discreet compared to the oblique Gridiron incision.
  • Scarring: Aimed at being concealed beneath the bikini line for reduced visible scarring.


Anatomical Details

  • Tissue Layers Involved: Involves cutting through the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and abdominal muscles.
  • Extent of Incision: Extends medially to the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and laterally to an equal distance.

 

Cosmetic Preference and Risks

  • Preferred for Cosmetic Outcome: Favored over the Gridiron incision for its superior cosmetic result.
  • Potential Risks: Its transverse orientation may increase the risk of injury to the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves, potentially leading to subsequent inguinal herniation.

Chevron Incision in Surgical Procedures

 

Introduction

The Chevron incision, also known as the ‘rooftop’ incision, is a surgical technique that crosses the abdomen’s midline. It is a subcostal incision situated just below the rib cage, extending from the mid to lateral costal ridge across the midline to the opposite side.

Characteristics and Anatomy

  • Extension of Kocher Incision: This incision is an extension of the Kocher incision across the midline, encompassing both sides of the abdomen.
  • Layers Penetrated: Involves cutting through the anterior rectus fascia, rectus muscle, internal oblique, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.
  • Blood Supply Considerations: The Chevron incision may interrupt the blood supply to the latissimus dorsi and the thoracodorsal artery during lateral pleural incisions, and may affect the superior epigastric branches during abdominal incisions.

Surgical Applications

  • Broad Exposure: Provides extensive exposure for surgeries involving the liver, pancreas, upper gastrointestinal region, adrenal glands, and kidneys.
  • Utilization: Commonly used in major procedures like liver transplantation, duodenal surgery, and adrenalectomy.

Advantages

  • Optimal Visualization: Offers excellent visibility and access to the targeted organs.

Disadvantages

  • Postoperative Pain: Associated with increased pain during the recovery phase.
  • Layered Closure Technique: The incision closure is performed in a layered fashion, involving suturing and tissue approximation.

Modifications

  • Mercedes Benz Incision: Can be modified into this form, which includes a vertical extension through the xiphoid and sternum, particularly useful in liver transplants or when addressing epigastric pathology requiring ample exposure.

Considerations

  • Surgical Decision Factors: The choice of incision is influenced by the need for access to the surgical field, especially in oncological resections, and considerations for postoperative recovery, including pain, complications, and the risk of incisional hernias.
  • Individualized Approach: The Chevron incision is one of several options available to surgeons, chosen based on the specific surgery requirements, patient anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise.

Inverted L Incision: An Approach for Abdominal Surgeries

Definition and Primary Use

  • Alternative Name: Known as the reversed L-shaped incision.
  • Surgical Applications: Used in abdominal surgeries, especially for hepatectomy (liver resection) and right hemicolectomy (removal of the right side of the colon).

Incision Structure

  • Composition: Consists of a midline incision combined with a transverse incision.
  • Junction Point: The two incisions meet at the umbilicus.

Advantages in Surgery

  • Visual Field: Offers an excellent visual field for deep segment resection of the right liver lobe and dissection of the short hepatic vein.
  • Comparison with Reverse T-shaped Incision: Considered less invasive than the reverse T-shaped incision.

Postoperative Considerations

  • Analgesia and Recovery: May necessitate increased analgesia and lead to longer postoperative hospital stays.
  • Cosmetic Outcome: Potential for poor cosmetic results due to scarring.

Technique Specifics

  • Hepatectomy Procedure: For hepatectomy, the upper midline incision extends transversely from the umbilicus to the ninth intercostal space.
  • Operative Approach: The field is maintained open with retractors, with hepatectomies conducted uniformly, regardless of the incision type.

   

Special Considerations

  • Necessity in Certain Cases: Essential for securing a visual field, particularly in men with deeper abdominal cavities, larger tumor diameters, or extensive liver damage.
  • Control of Bleeding: May be crucial in managing excessive bleeding during surgery.

Conclusion

  • Surgical Relevance: The inverted L incision is a commonly employed method in abdominal surgeries, notably for hepatectomy and right hemicolectomy.
  • Operative and Postoperative Implications: It facilitates deep segment resection but may lead to increased postoperative care needs and cosmetic challenges.

Rutherford-Morrison Incision: Overview and Applications

 

Introduction to Rutherford-Morrison Incision

  • Definition: The Rutherford-Morrison incision is a surgical technique primarily used in renal transplants.
  • Location: It can be executed on either the left or right side of the body.

Surgical Technique

  • Starting Point: The incision begins approximately 2 cm above the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS).
  • Direction: It extends obliquely downwards from the starting point.
  • Relation to Gridiron Incision: This method is an extension of the gridiron incision, commonly used for appendectomies.

Purpose and Utility

  • Access Point: It provides an entry into the abdominal cavity.
  • Surgical Uses: Especially beneficial for procedures involving the kidneys.

The Gridiron Incision

  • Nature of Incision: The gridiron incision is a muscle-splitting incision.
  • Primary Use: It is often the preferred method for open appendectomies.
  • Extension to Rutherford-Morrison: When extended laterally, it transforms into the Rutherford-Morrison incision.

Surgical Anatomy

  • Comparison with Gridiron Incision: The Rutherford-Morrison incision shares similarities with the gridiron incision but is more extensive.
  • Orientation: It is oblique and curvilinear in nature.
  • Application in Surgery: Ideal for accessing organs in procedures like renal transplants.

Pfannenstiel Incision

 

Introduction

  • Alternative Names: Referred to as the Kerr incision or pubic incision.
  • Primary Use: Widely used in gynecologic and orthopedic surgeries, notably for Caesarean sections.

Technique and Application

  • Incision Location: Made just above the pubic symphysis, along a horizontal and slightly curved line.
  • Procedure Steps: Involves lifting the skin and subcutaneous fat from the rectus muscle fascia towards the head, granting access to the lower midline of the anterior abdominal wall fascia.
  • Fascia Incision: The fascia is vertically incised to separate the rectus muscles for abdominal entry.

Advantages

  • Aesthetic Benefits: The scar is usually concealed by pubic hair and doesn’t distort the belly button.
  • Healing Properties: Generally heals faster than traditional vertical incisions.
  • Reduced Complications: Associated with a lower risk of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia; minimal scarring post-healing.

Limitations

  • Exposure Limitation: Offers a broad view of the central pelvis but limited exposure to the upper abdomen.
  • Use in Oncologic Surgery: Caution advised in oncologic surgery due to restricted upper abdominal exposure and limited access to aortic and iliac vessels.

Conclusion

  • Surgical Relevance: The Pfannenstiel incision is a prevalent choice, particularly for Caesarean sections and other gynecologic and orthopedic surgeries.
  • Balancing Benefits and Restrictions: While it offers cosmetic and healing advantages, its utility is constrained in surgeries requiring extensive access to the upper abdomen.

Laparoscopic Approch

 

Introduction to Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Also Known As: Keyhole or minimally invasive surgery.
  • Surgical Technique: Utilizes small incisions and specialized instruments for abdominal and pelvic surgeries.

The Role of the Laparoscope

  • Instrumentation: Involves a laparoscope, a thin rod equipped with a camera.
  • Functionality: Provides visualization of the surgical area.

Procedure Methodology

  • Initial Incision: Begins with a small incision, often near the belly button or pelvic bone.
  • Creation of Space: Carbon dioxide gas is introduced to expand the cavity and improve visibility.
  • Use of Trocars: Narrow tubes inserted as ports for the laparoscope and surgical instruments.

Advantages Over Traditional Surgery

  • Benefits: Includes smaller scars, quicker recovery, reduced pain and risk of infection and hemorrhage.
  • Reduced Complications: Lesser postoperative adhesion formation and shorter hospital stays.

Applications of Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Range of Procedures: Used for cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia repair, colorectal resection, and gynecological surgeries.
  • Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses: Helpful in addressing tumors, injuries, infections, and unexplained abdominal pain.

Current Trends and Suitability

  • Standard Approach: Becoming the preferred method for many surgeries due to enhanced patient outcomes.
  • Patient and Condition Specific: Suitability varies based on individual patient needs and conditions. In certain cases, traditional open surgery may still be required.

General Approaches to Laparoscopic Access

Veress Needle Technique

 

Oldest Method: Known as the traditional approach for establishing pneumoperitoneum.

Process: Involves using the Veress needle, a spring-loaded needle that retracts upon entry into the abdominal cavity.

Purpose: Creates a working space by inflating the abdomen with gas.

Open (Hasson) Technique

 

Incision-Based Method: Involves an incision, typically above the umbilicus.

Trocar Insertion: The first trocar is inserted openly through the incision.

Safety and Reliability: Considered safer, particularly for patients with previous abdominal surgeries.

Direct Trocar Insertion

 

Procedure: Involves the direct insertion of the first trocar without prior pneumoperitoneum.

Advantages: Reported as faster and reliable, offering a shorter procedure time and reduced risk of entry failure.

Single-Port Surgery: An Overview

 

Introduction to Single-Port Surgery

  • Definition: Single-port surgery, known by various names such as single-port access surgery (SPA), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), is a minimally invasive surgical technique where the surgeon operates through a single entry point, often the navel.
  • Method: It involves performing the surgical procedure through a single incision, usually in the patient’s navel or abdomen.

Applications Across Specialties

  • Versatility: This approach is applicable in various procedures across different organ systems, including urology, gynecology, and ear, nose, and throat surgeries.

Applications

 

SPL has been applied in surgeries like gastric banding, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, hernia repair, hysterectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, nephrectomy, and sacrocolpopexy. It’s been used in clinical trials at institutions like Cleveland Clinic and Geneva University Hospital.

 

Risks and Benefits

  • Advantages include less postoperative pain, reduced blood loss, quicker recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes.
  • Potential complications can be significant, such as postoperative pain, organ injury, bleeding, infection, hernias, adhesions, and scarring.

History

  • SPL’s significant procedures date back to the late 1990s, with increasing publicity and development towards less invasive surgery.
  • The first documented SPL procedure, a gallbladder removal, occurred in 1997, leading to a wide application in various surgical fields.

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)

 

Introduction to NOTES

  • Definition: NOTES is a surgical approach that offers minimally invasive access to the abdominal cavity through natural orifices, leaving no visible scars.
  • Access Points: The peritoneal cavity is accessed through natural orifices like the mouth, anus, vagina, or urethra.

Techniques and Procedures in NOTES

  • Approach: NOTES involves using instruments within a body cavity, such as the peritoneal cavity, accessed via a natural orifice rather than through the skin.
  • Hybrid NOTES: This approach combines NOTES with direct transcutaneous access, often paired with laparoscopic instrumentation.
  • Preferred Routes: Currently, the most favored routes for NOTES are through the stomach via a modified Seldinger dilatation and through the vaginal vault.

Applications and Growing Interest

  • Surgeon and Public Interest: NOTES has seen increasing interest following the success of minimally invasive surgery.
  • Common Procedures: It is used in procedures like peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

Advantages of NOTES

  • Minimally Invasive Nature: NOTES is less invasive than traditional open or laparoscopic surgery.
  • Patient Benefits: It results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, and minimal or no abdominal scarring.

Challenges and Safe Access Principles

  • Technical Challenges: Developing a safe and reproducible technique for accessing the operative field is complex.
  • Principles of Safe Access: These include minimal tissue injury, good exposure, avoiding vascular and visceral injury, and maintaining a seal and instrument manipulation capability.

Evolution and Future Perspective

  • Current Status: NOTES is rapidly evolving in the field of minimally invasive surgery, offering excellent results.
  • Need for Research: The safety, costs, and ultimate patient benefit of NOTES must be thoroughly evaluated through well-designed prospective studies.

 

Procedure Access
Cholecystectomy Vaginal, umbilical, gastric, urethral
Appendectomy Vaginal, gastric
Sigmoid colectomy Rectal, gastric
Sleeve gastrectomy Vaginal
Partial gastrectomy Vaginal
Pancreatectomy Rectal
Ventral hernia repair Gastric, rectal
Abdominal exploration Rectal, gastric
Nephrectomy Gastric, vaginal, umbilical
Thoracoscopy Gastric, urethral

Surgical Approaches in Abdominal Surgery

 

Midline Incision

  • Description: A vertical cut along the abdomen’s center, starting above the pubic bone and potentially extending towards the chest.
  • Usage: Commonly used for diagnostic laparotomies, offering wide access to abdominal organs.
  • Recovery: May result in a longer recuperation period.

Transverse Incision

  • Application: Often employed in gynecological surgeries like cesarean deliveries.
  • Benefits: Generally allows for quicker recovery compared to a midline incision.
  • Flexibility: Provides less operational maneuverability.

Oblique Incisions

  • Purpose: Tailored for specific organ exposures, positioned 2-5 cm off the midline.
  • Access: Facilitates access to the stomach, liver, and spleen.

Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Technique: Involves small incisions, typically in the navel, for inserting a camera and instruments.
  • Advantages: Improved recovery times, shorter hospital stays, and a quicker return to normal activities.

Other Incisions

  • Varieties: Include the Lanz incision, paramedian incisions, and the Kochler incision, each for specific surgeries.
  • Specific Applications: Tailored for different types of abdominal operations.

Types of Procedures

  • Conventional Surgeries: Such as segmental colectomies, abdominoperineal resection, small bowel resection, repair of parastomal hernias, ostomy creation and revisions, low anterior resection.
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures: Appendectomy, cholecystectomy, hernia repairs, etc.

Recovery and Post-Operative Care

  • Hospital Stay: Usually requires four to five nights in the hospital.
  • Home Recovery: Approximately six weeks of recovery at home before resuming work or regular activities.
  • Healing Process: Varies based on the surgery’s depth and the patient’s overall health.
  • Preparation and Aftercare: Essential for successful recovery.

Potential Complications

  • Risks: Include hematoma, stitch abscess, wound infection, wound dehiscence, fistula formation, wound pain, hernia, and scarring.
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery: Reduced risk of these complications due to advancements in surgical techniques.

Structured Overview of Surgical Incisions

Surgical incisions are categorized based on their location and specific surgical purposes. 

Basics

  1. Midline Incision
    • A vertical cut along the midline of the abdomen.
    • Provides wide access to abdominal organs.
    • Minimizes muscle cutting, reducing pain and aiding recovery.
  2. Paramedian Incision
    • Positioned slightly off the midline.
    • Used when midline approach is not ideal, offering access to specific regions.

Upper Abdomen

  1. Kocher Incision
    • A subcostal incision, usually on the right.
    • Accesses the gallbladder, duodenum, and biliary tract.
    • Offers excellent exposure for upper abdominal procedures.
  2. Chevron Incision
    • A bilateral subcostal incision in an inverted ‘V’ shape.
    • Ideal for liver, pancreas, and biliary system surgeries.
  3. Inverted L Incision
    • Combines midline and transverse incisions.
    • Used in hepatectomies and right hemicolectomies.

Appendectomy

  1. McBurney Incision
    • An oblique incision over McBurney’s point.
    • Specifically for appendectomies.
  2. Lanz Incision
    • A transverse variation of McBurney’s incision.
    • Offers cosmetic advantages with minimal scarring.

Lower Abdomen

  1. Rutherford-Morrison Incision
    • An oblique extension of the gridiron incision.
    • Primarily for renal transplants and kidney surgeries.
  2. Pfannenstiel Incision
    • Location: Made slightly above the pubic bone.
    • Usage: Commonly used in gynecological surgeries, cesarean sections, and lower abdominal procedures.
    • Advantages: Offers cosmetic benefits due to its location and reduced post-operative pain due to minimal muscle cutting.

Midline Incisions in Abdominal Surgery

 

Introduction

A midline incision is a frequently used surgical approach in abdominal procedures. Characterized by its vertical orientation, this incision aligns with the linea alba, the central line of the abdomen. It spans from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis, curving around the umbilicus.

Access and Exposure

The midline incision is renowned for offering superior exposure to the abdominal and retroperitoneal areas. Its key advantages include:

  • Broad Access: Enables rapid and extensive access to the entire abdominal cavity.
  • Low Risk of Injury: Minimizes the risk of significant vascular or nerve damage.

Technique

The incision involves cutting through various tissue layers:

  • Skin and Subcutaneous Layers: Involves the skin, Camper’s fascia (subcutaneous fatty layer), and Scarpa’s fascia (membranous layer).
  • Deeper Layers: Includes the linea alba, transversalis fascia, preperitoneal fat, and the parietal peritoneum.

Advantages

The midline incision is preferred for several reasons:

  • Efficient Entry: Allows quick access into the abdominal cavity with minimal blood loss.
  • Easy Modification: Can be readily extended as needed based on operative findings.
  • Simplified Closure: Does not necessitate muscle splitting, enabling faster, one-layer closure.

Considerations and Disadvantages

Despite its advantages, the midline incision has some potential drawbacks:

  • Recovery and Scarring: May lead to longer recovery times and significant scarring.
  • Risk of Complications: Associated with possible complications, including infection, hernia, and adhesions.

Paramedian Incisions in Abdominal Surgery

 

Overview

Paramedian incisions are a specific surgical approach utilized in open abdominal procedures. Their main characteristic is their placement, typically 2-5 cm from the trunk’s midline on the abdomen. This strategic positioning allows surgeons to access vital abdominal structures, including the stomach, liver, and spleen.

Incision Technique

The process of making a paramedian incision involves several steps:

  • Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue: The initial cut is made through the skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue.
  • Anterior Rectus Sheath: The incision then extends through the anterior rectus sheath.
  • Rectus Muscle and Posterior Sheath: If feasible, the rectus muscle is moved laterally to expose the posterior rectus sheath, particularly above the arcuate line.

The precision in the placement of this incision is critical for ensuring both optimal visibility during the operation and maintaining adequate blood supply.

Advantages and Considerations

Paramedian incisions are chosen for several reasons:

  • Reduced Incisional Hernias: Compared to midline incisions, paramedian incisions have been reported to result in significantly fewer incisional hernias.
  • Major Elective Laparotomies: They are often recommended for major elective laparotomies due to these benefits.

However, there are also considerations to bear in mind:

  • Post-Operative Pain: These incisions might lead to slightly increased post-operative pain, attributed to the layered closure technique involving suturing and approximation.
  • Surgical Decision: The choice of incision is contingent upon various factors, including the specific surgical procedure, the patient’s overall condition, and the surgeon’s expertise and preference.
  • Potential Complications: As with any surgical procedure, potential complications such as infection, hernia formation, and adhesions should be considered.

Kocher Incision

Overview

The Kocher incision is a specialized surgical incision primarily employed in operations involving the gallbladder, biliary tree, and liver. Positioned just below the rib cage on the right side of the abdomen, this subcostal incision runs parallel to and below the subcostal margin, the lower border of the rib cage.


Characteristics and Anatomy

  • Location: Right side of the abdomen, beneath the rib cage.
  • Direction: Parallel to and inferior to the subcostal margin.
  • Layers Involved: The incision penetrates the anterior rectus fascia, rectus muscle, internal oblique, transverse abdominis, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.
  • Blood Supply Considerations: Unlike the midline incision, the Kocher incision disrupts the abdominal wall’s blood supply, particularly affecting the distal portion of the superior epigastric vessels.

Advantages

  • Enhanced Visualization: Offers superior access and visibility to organs like the gallbladder and biliary tree.
  • Reduced Hospital Stay: Associated with potentially shorter hospitalization compared to midline incisions.
  • Lower Incisional Hernia Risk: Reports suggest a decreased incidence of incisional hernias versus midline incisions.

Disadvantages

  • Increased Postoperative Pain: May result in more pain after surgery compared to other incision types.
  • Longer Surgical Time: The closure of multiple layers can extend the duration of the operation.

Usage

The Kocher incision is commonly utilized for cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal) and can be adapted for more complex liver or pancreas procedures. It can be modified into a Chevron or rooftop incision (extending across the abdomen) or a Mercedes Benz incision (including a vertical chest extension).

Considerations

  • Surgical Decision Factors: The choice of incision is influenced by several factors, including the need for surgical field access, especially in oncological resections, and postoperative recovery considerations like pain, potential complications, and the risk of incisional hernias.
  • Individualized Approach: The Kocher incision is one of many surgical options, chosen based on the specific requirements of the surgery, the patient’s anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise and judgment.

McBurney Incision

Introduction

The McBurney incision, also known as the Gridiron incision, is a specialized surgical incision primarily used for appendectomies, the removal of the appendix.

Historical Background

  • Origin: Named after Charles McBurney, a 19th-century New York surgeon.
  • McBurney’s Point: Identified as the “seat of greatest pain” in appendicitis, located in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, a third of the way from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus.


Technique and Anatomy

  • Location and Direction: The incision is obliquely made at McBurney’s point, generally perpendicular to the line from the umbilicus to the right anterior superior iliac spine.
  • Tissue Layers Involved: Involves cutting through the skin, external oblique, internal oblique, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.

Advantages

  • Cosmetic Outcomes: Follows the Langer’s lines of skin tension, resulting in potentially favorable cosmetic results.
  • Surgical Exposure: Offers effective exposure for conducting open appendectomies.

Potential Risks

  • Incisional Hernias: Although the risk is low, the development of incisional hernias is a potential complication.
  • Other Complications: Includes risks like infection and adhesions.

Lanz Incision: A Surgical Approach for Appendectomies

 

Overview of the Lanz Incision

  • Also Known As: Referred to as the Rockey-Davis incision.
  • Primary Use: Predominantly utilized for open appendectomies.

Location and Technique

  • Positioning: The incision is made at McBurney’s point, situated in the right iliac fossa.
  • Landmarks: It is aligned at the junction of the middle and outer thirds of a line from the right anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the umbilicus.

Cosmetic Considerations

  • Aesthetic Design: The Lanz incision is more cosmetically discreet compared to the oblique Gridiron incision.
  • Scarring: Aimed at being concealed beneath the bikini line for reduced visible scarring.


Anatomical Details

  • Tissue Layers Involved: Involves cutting through the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and abdominal muscles.
  • Extent of Incision: Extends medially to the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and laterally to an equal distance.

 

Cosmetic Preference and Risks

  • Preferred for Cosmetic Outcome: Favored over the Gridiron incision for its superior cosmetic result.
  • Potential Risks: Its transverse orientation may increase the risk of injury to the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves, potentially leading to subsequent inguinal herniation.

Chevron Incision in Surgical Procedures

 

Introduction

The Chevron incision, also known as the ‘rooftop’ incision, is a surgical technique that crosses the abdomen’s midline. It is a subcostal incision situated just below the rib cage, extending from the mid to lateral costal ridge across the midline to the opposite side.

Characteristics and Anatomy

  • Extension of Kocher Incision: This incision is an extension of the Kocher incision across the midline, encompassing both sides of the abdomen.
  • Layers Penetrated: Involves cutting through the anterior rectus fascia, rectus muscle, internal oblique, transversalis fascia, and peritoneum.
  • Blood Supply Considerations: The Chevron incision may interrupt the blood supply to the latissimus dorsi and the thoracodorsal artery during lateral pleural incisions, and may affect the superior epigastric branches during abdominal incisions.

Surgical Applications

  • Broad Exposure: Provides extensive exposure for surgeries involving the liver, pancreas, upper gastrointestinal region, adrenal glands, and kidneys.
  • Utilization: Commonly used in major procedures like liver transplantation, duodenal surgery, and adrenalectomy.

Advantages

  • Optimal Visualization: Offers excellent visibility and access to the targeted organs.

Disadvantages

  • Postoperative Pain: Associated with increased pain during the recovery phase.
  • Layered Closure Technique: The incision closure is performed in a layered fashion, involving suturing and tissue approximation.

Modifications

  • Mercedes Benz Incision: Can be modified into this form, which includes a vertical extension through the xiphoid and sternum, particularly useful in liver transplants or when addressing epigastric pathology requiring ample exposure.

Considerations

  • Surgical Decision Factors: The choice of incision is influenced by the need for access to the surgical field, especially in oncological resections, and considerations for postoperative recovery, including pain, complications, and the risk of incisional hernias.
  • Individualized Approach: The Chevron incision is one of several options available to surgeons, chosen based on the specific surgery requirements, patient anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise.

Inverted L Incision: An Approach for Abdominal Surgeries

Definition and Primary Use

  • Alternative Name: Known as the reversed L-shaped incision.
  • Surgical Applications: Used in abdominal surgeries, especially for hepatectomy (liver resection) and right hemicolectomy (removal of the right side of the colon).

Incision Structure

  • Composition: Consists of a midline incision combined with a transverse incision.
  • Junction Point: The two incisions meet at the umbilicus.

Advantages in Surgery

  • Visual Field: Offers an excellent visual field for deep segment resection of the right liver lobe and dissection of the short hepatic vein.
  • Comparison with Reverse T-shaped Incision: Considered less invasive than the reverse T-shaped incision.

Postoperative Considerations

  • Analgesia and Recovery: May necessitate increased analgesia and lead to longer postoperative hospital stays.
  • Cosmetic Outcome: Potential for poor cosmetic results due to scarring.

Technique Specifics

  • Hepatectomy Procedure: For hepatectomy, the upper midline incision extends transversely from the umbilicus to the ninth intercostal space.
  • Operative Approach: The field is maintained open with retractors, with hepatectomies conducted uniformly, regardless of the incision type.

   

Special Considerations

  • Necessity in Certain Cases: Essential for securing a visual field, particularly in men with deeper abdominal cavities, larger tumor diameters, or extensive liver damage.
  • Control of Bleeding: May be crucial in managing excessive bleeding during surgery.

Conclusion

  • Surgical Relevance: The inverted L incision is a commonly employed method in abdominal surgeries, notably for hepatectomy and right hemicolectomy.
  • Operative and Postoperative Implications: It facilitates deep segment resection but may lead to increased postoperative care needs and cosmetic challenges.

Rutherford-Morrison Incision: Overview and Applications

 

Introduction to Rutherford-Morrison Incision

  • Definition: The Rutherford-Morrison incision is a surgical technique primarily used in renal transplants.
  • Location: It can be executed on either the left or right side of the body.

Surgical Technique

  • Starting Point: The incision begins approximately 2 cm above the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS).
  • Direction: It extends obliquely downwards from the starting point.
  • Relation to Gridiron Incision: This method is an extension of the gridiron incision, commonly used for appendectomies.

Purpose and Utility

  • Access Point: It provides an entry into the abdominal cavity.
  • Surgical Uses: Especially beneficial for procedures involving the kidneys.

The Gridiron Incision

  • Nature of Incision: The gridiron incision is a muscle-splitting incision.
  • Primary Use: It is often the preferred method for open appendectomies.
  • Extension to Rutherford-Morrison: When extended laterally, it transforms into the Rutherford-Morrison incision.

Surgical Anatomy

  • Comparison with Gridiron Incision: The Rutherford-Morrison incision shares similarities with the gridiron incision but is more extensive.
  • Orientation: It is oblique and curvilinear in nature.
  • Application in Surgery: Ideal for accessing organs in procedures like renal transplants.

Pfannenstiel Incision

 

Introduction

  • Alternative Names: Referred to as the Kerr incision or pubic incision.
  • Primary Use: Widely used in gynecologic and orthopedic surgeries, notably for Caesarean sections.

Technique and Application

  • Incision Location: Made just above the pubic symphysis, along a horizontal and slightly curved line.
  • Procedure Steps: Involves lifting the skin and subcutaneous fat from the rectus muscle fascia towards the head, granting access to the lower midline of the anterior abdominal wall fascia.
  • Fascia Incision: The fascia is vertically incised to separate the rectus muscles for abdominal entry.

Advantages

  • Aesthetic Benefits: The scar is usually concealed by pubic hair and doesn’t distort the belly button.
  • Healing Properties: Generally heals faster than traditional vertical incisions.
  • Reduced Complications: Associated with a lower risk of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia; minimal scarring post-healing.

Limitations

  • Exposure Limitation: Offers a broad view of the central pelvis but limited exposure to the upper abdomen.
  • Use in Oncologic Surgery: Caution advised in oncologic surgery due to restricted upper abdominal exposure and limited access to aortic and iliac vessels.

Conclusion

  • Surgical Relevance: The Pfannenstiel incision is a prevalent choice, particularly for Caesarean sections and other gynecologic and orthopedic surgeries.
  • Balancing Benefits and Restrictions: While it offers cosmetic and healing advantages, its utility is constrained in surgeries requiring extensive access to the upper abdomen.

Laparoscopic Approch

 

Introduction to Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Also Known As: Keyhole or minimally invasive surgery.
  • Surgical Technique: Utilizes small incisions and specialized instruments for abdominal and pelvic surgeries.

The Role of the Laparoscope

  • Instrumentation: Involves a laparoscope, a thin rod equipped with a camera.
  • Functionality: Provides visualization of the surgical area.

Procedure Methodology

  • Initial Incision: Begins with a small incision, often near the belly button or pelvic bone.
  • Creation of Space: Carbon dioxide gas is introduced to expand the cavity and improve visibility.
  • Use of Trocars: Narrow tubes inserted as ports for the laparoscope and surgical instruments.

Advantages Over Traditional Surgery

  • Benefits: Includes smaller scars, quicker recovery, reduced pain and risk of infection and hemorrhage.
  • Reduced Complications: Lesser postoperative adhesion formation and shorter hospital stays.

Applications of Laparoscopic Surgery

  • Range of Procedures: Used for cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia repair, colorectal resection, and gynecological surgeries.
  • Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses: Helpful in addressing tumors, injuries, infections, and unexplained abdominal pain.

Current Trends and Suitability

  • Standard Approach: Becoming the preferred method for many surgeries due to enhanced patient outcomes.
  • Patient and Condition Specific: Suitability varies based on individual patient needs and conditions. In certain cases, traditional open surgery may still be required.

General Approaches to Laparoscopic Access

Veress Needle Technique

 

Oldest Method: Known as the traditional approach for establishing pneumoperitoneum.

Process: Involves using the Veress needle, a spring-loaded needle that retracts upon entry into the abdominal cavity.

Purpose: Creates a working space by inflating the abdomen with gas.

Open (Hasson) Technique

 

Incision-Based Method: Involves an incision, typically above the umbilicus.

Trocar Insertion: The first trocar is inserted openly through the incision.

Safety and Reliability: Considered safer, particularly for patients with previous abdominal surgeries.

Direct Trocar Insertion

 

Procedure: Involves the direct insertion of the first trocar without prior pneumoperitoneum.

Advantages: Reported as faster and reliable, offering a shorter procedure time and reduced risk of entry failure.

Single-Port Surgery: An Overview

 

Introduction to Single-Port Surgery

  • Definition: Single-port surgery, known by various names such as single-port access surgery (SPA), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), is a minimally invasive surgical technique where the surgeon operates through a single entry point, often the navel.
  • Method: It involves performing the surgical procedure through a single incision, usually in the patient’s navel or abdomen.

Applications Across Specialties

  • Versatility: This approach is applicable in various procedures across different organ systems, including urology, gynecology, and ear, nose, and throat surgeries.

Applications

 

SPL has been applied in surgeries like gastric banding, appendectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, hernia repair, hysterectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, nephrectomy, and sacrocolpopexy. It’s been used in clinical trials at institutions like Cleveland Clinic and Geneva University Hospital.

 

Risks and Benefits

  • Advantages include less postoperative pain, reduced blood loss, quicker recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes.
  • Potential complications can be significant, such as postoperative pain, organ injury, bleeding, infection, hernias, adhesions, and scarring.

History

  • SPL’s significant procedures date back to the late 1990s, with increasing publicity and development towards less invasive surgery.
  • The first documented SPL procedure, a gallbladder removal, occurred in 1997, leading to a wide application in various surgical fields.

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)

 

Introduction to NOTES

  • Definition: NOTES is a surgical approach that offers minimally invasive access to the abdominal cavity through natural orifices, leaving no visible scars.
  • Access Points: The peritoneal cavity is accessed through natural orifices like the mouth, anus, vagina, or urethra.

Techniques and Procedures in NOTES

  • Approach: NOTES involves using instruments within a body cavity, such as the peritoneal cavity, accessed via a natural orifice rather than through the skin.
  • Hybrid NOTES: This approach combines NOTES with direct transcutaneous access, often paired with laparoscopic instrumentation.
  • Preferred Routes: Currently, the most favored routes for NOTES are through the stomach via a modified Seldinger dilatation and through the vaginal vault.

Applications and Growing Interest

  • Surgeon and Public Interest: NOTES has seen increasing interest following the success of minimally invasive surgery.
  • Common Procedures: It is used in procedures like peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

Advantages of NOTES

  • Minimally Invasive Nature: NOTES is less invasive than traditional open or laparoscopic surgery.
  • Patient Benefits: It results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, and minimal or no abdominal scarring.

Challenges and Safe Access Principles

  • Technical Challenges: Developing a safe and reproducible technique for accessing the operative field is complex.
  • Principles of Safe Access: These include minimal tissue injury, good exposure, avoiding vascular and visceral injury, and maintaining a seal and instrument manipulation capability.

Evolution and Future Perspective

  • Current Status: NOTES is rapidly evolving in the field of minimally invasive surgery, offering excellent results.
  • Need for Research: The safety, costs, and ultimate patient benefit of NOTES must be thoroughly evaluated through well-designed prospective studies.

 

Procedure Access
Cholecystectomy Vaginal, umbilical, gastric, urethral
Appendectomy Vaginal, gastric
Sigmoid colectomy Rectal, gastric
Sleeve gastrectomy Vaginal
Partial gastrectomy Vaginal
Pancreatectomy Rectal
Ventral hernia repair Gastric, rectal
Abdominal exploration Rectal, gastric
Nephrectomy Gastric, vaginal, umbilical
Thoracoscopy Gastric, urethral

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *